<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Review- Pentax K200D DSLR</title> <atom:link href="http://ishouldlogoff.com/2009/07/04/pentax-k200d-dslr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ishouldlogoff.com/2009/07/04/pentax-k200d-dslr/</link> <description>log off and live!</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Gear for two years of travel &#124; i should log off</title><link>http://ishouldlogoff.com/2009/07/04/pentax-k200d-dslr/comment-page-1/#comment-9579</link> <dc:creator>Gear for two years of travel &#124; i should log off</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishouldlogoff.com/?p=1393#comment-9579</guid> <description>[...] Pentax DSLR K200D – Our big and heavy Pentax DSLR (codename Peter) is still shooting. We traded in our Canon before the trip because the Pentax is not only cheaper, but has a water-resistant and rugged body&#8230;which no doubt helped it to survive given that we only had it in a tiny Zing camera case. The full range zoom lens we purchased to go along with it isn&#8217;t &#8216;rugged&#8217; rated and still works just fine. This camera still gives us better color saturation than any other DSLR we&#8217;ve come across and the only way it shows its age is that the sound it makes when you take a picture is different than it was at the start. This is a phenomenal camera (read our initial review) and I will not depart from Pentax DSLR cameras. Although our model is no longer being produced the value offered by Pentax over the more common Canon and Nikon brands is simply too good to pass up. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pentax DSLR K200D – Our big and heavy Pentax DSLR (codename Peter) is still shooting. We traded in our Canon before the trip because the Pentax is not only cheaper, but has a water-resistant and rugged body&#8230;which no doubt helped it to survive given that we only had it in a tiny Zing camera case. The full range zoom lens we purchased to go along with it isn&#8217;t &#8216;rugged&#8217; rated and still works just fine. This camera still gives us better color saturation than any other DSLR we&#8217;ve come across and the only way it shows its age is that the sound it makes when you take a picture is different than it was at the start. This is a phenomenal camera (read our initial review) and I will not depart from Pentax DSLR cameras. Although our model is no longer being produced the value offered by Pentax over the more common Canon and Nikon brands is simply too good to pass up. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Review- Zing Neoprene Camera Case &#171; i should log off</title><link>http://ishouldlogoff.com/2009/07/04/pentax-k200d-dslr/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link> <dc:creator>Review- Zing Neoprene Camera Case &#171; i should log off</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishouldlogoff.com/?p=1393#comment-982</guid> <description>[...] a shiny new SLR camera? Don&#8217;t want to carry around a big camera case? Look no further than the Zing. This [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a shiny new SLR camera? Don&#8217;t want to carry around a big camera case? Look no further than the Zing. This [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: ishouldlogoff.com @ 2012-05-22 14:11:20 -->
